<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Environmental Law &#38; Policy Center &#187; Protecting Natural Places</title>
	<atom:link href="http://elpc.org/category/natural-places/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://elpc.org</link>
	<description>Protecting the Midwest&#039;s Environment and Natural Heritage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 21:23:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Iowa Judge Upholds Clean Water Standards</title>
		<link>http://elpc.org/2012/04/05/iowa-judge-upholds-clean-water-standards</link>
		<comments>http://elpc.org/2012/04/05/iowa-judge-upholds-clean-water-standards#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 17:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DJakubiak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ELPC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protecting Natural Places]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rivers and Lakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Des Moines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa Antidegredation Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa Environmental Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Center News Clips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elpc.org/?p=8733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An Iowa Judge has tossed out a case challenging clean water standards  intended to stop pollution from entering the state&#8217;s unpolluted waterways. In their story about the case, the Associated Press caught up with Josh Mandelbaum, Staff Attorney in ELPC&#8217;s Des Moines office.  &#8221;&#8216;It&#8217;s a major victory for water quality in Iowa,&#8221; said Josh Mandelbaum, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An Iowa Judge has tossed out a case challenging clean water standards  intended to stop pollution from entering the state&#8217;s unpolluted waterways. In their story about the case, the Associated Press caught up with Josh Mandelbaum, Staff Attorney in ELPC&#8217;s Des Moines office.</p>
<p><em> &#8221;&#8216;It&#8217;s a major victory for water quality in Iowa,&#8221; said Josh Mandelbaum, an attorney for the Environmental Law and Policy Center, an environmental advocacy group. &#8220;These rules are designed to protect public health and to protect our waterways and the uses of those waterways whether it&#8217;s making them safe for outdoor recreation or safe for drinking water.&#8217;&#8221;</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.htrnews.com/usatoday/article/38975691?odyssey=mod%7Cnewswell%7Ctext%7CFRONTPAGE%7Cp">Read the full story.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elpc.org/2012/04/05/iowa-judge-upholds-clean-water-standards/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>E&amp;E News&#8217; ClimateWire Digs into Chicago Stormwater Issues</title>
		<link>http://elpc.org/2012/04/04/ee-news-climatewire-digs-into-chicago-stormwater-issues</link>
		<comments>http://elpc.org/2012/04/04/ee-news-climatewire-digs-into-chicago-stormwater-issues#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 14:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DJakubiak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ELPC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Lakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rivers and Lakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago Area Waterways System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ClimateWire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E&E News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jessica Dexter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lake Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Center News Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metropolitan Water Reclamation District]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sewage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stormwater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TARP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tunnel and Reservoir Plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waste water]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elpc.org/?p=8727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For an in-depth piece looking at the impact heavy rains have had on Chicago&#8217;s sewer system &#8212; and the resulting release of polluted wastewater into the Chicago River and Lake Michigan &#8212; Daniel Cusick spoke with the Environmental Law &#38; Policy Center&#8217;s Jessica Dexter. &#8220;Dexter and other critics say there&#8217;s no reason to spend another [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For an<a href="http://www.eenews.net/climatewire/2012/04/04/1"> in-depth piece looking at the impact heavy rains have had on Chicago&#8217;s sewer system</a> &#8212; and the resulting release of polluted wastewater into the Chicago River and Lake Michigan &#8212; <a href="https://twitter.com/#!/dcusickmpls">Daniel Cusick</a> spoke with the Environmental Law &amp; Policy Center&#8217;s <a href="http://elpc.org/dexter">Jessica Dexter</a>.</p>
<p><em>&#8220;Dexter and other critics say there&#8217;s no reason to spend another 17 years digging reservoirs when Chicago&#8217;s stormwater management challenges are growing more daunting by the year. If [the Tunnel and Reservoir Plan (TARP)] is to be the first line of defense against sewer overflows, the argument goes, it should be deployed much faster.</em></p>
<p><em>&#8216;We need to finish what we started in 1972, and do it as quickly as we can,&#8217; Dexter said.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>To read the full story, <a href="http://www.eenews.net/trial">sign up for an E&amp;Enews trial</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elpc.org/2012/04/04/ee-news-climatewire-digs-into-chicago-stormwater-issues/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Victory! Iowa’s Clean Water Standards Protected from Attacks</title>
		<link>http://elpc.org/2012/04/03/victory-iowas-clean-water-standards-protected-from-attacks</link>
		<comments>http://elpc.org/2012/04/03/victory-iowas-clean-water-standards-protected-from-attacks#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 16:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kcoleman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ELPC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rivers and Lakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-Degradation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antidegradation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Water Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa Environmental Council]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elpc.org/?p=8680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two years ago, ELPC and our allies at the Iowa Environmental Council (IEC) celebrated Iowa’s adoption of strong “anti-degradation” standards – an important but often ignored part of the Clean Water Act designed to keep unnecessary pollution out of clean waterways. But since then, naysayers have been challenging this important standard and even issuing intrusive [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two years ago, ELPC and our allies at the Iowa Environmental Council (IEC) celebrated Iowa’s adoption of strong “anti-degradation” standards – an important but often ignored part of the Clean Water Act designed to keep unnecessary pollution out of clean waterways. But since then, naysayers have been challenging this important standard and even issuing intrusive subpoenas to intimidate local environmentalists. On March 30<sup>th</sup>, ELPC’s and IEC’s work to fend off these attacks and protect the standards achieved a significant courtroom victory when a judge threw out the lawsuit challenging the clean water standards. This follows up on our victory from October 2011, when the judge dismissed the groundless subpoena requests and protected IEC’s first amendment rights. We look forward to continuing to protect and effectively implement Iowa’s strong clean water standard.<em> </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elpc.org/2012/04/03/victory-iowas-clean-water-standards-protected-from-attacks/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Progressive Farmer: Environmentalists Push Lawsuits on Farm Nutrients</title>
		<link>http://elpc.org/2012/03/21/the-progressive-farmer-environmentalists-push-lawsuits-on-farm-nutrients</link>
		<comments>http://elpc.org/2012/03/21/the-progressive-farmer-environmentalists-push-lawsuits-on-farm-nutrients#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 16:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kcoleman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ELPC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rivers and Lakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Center News Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressive Farmer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water Quality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elpc.org/?p=8675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Progressive Farmer takes a look at new lawsuits filed against the U.S. EPA for failing to enact pollution-control standards on agriculture. Read the article.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Progressive Farmer takes a look at new lawsuits filed against the U.S. EPA for failing to enact pollution-control standards on agriculture. <a href="http://www.dtnprogressivefarmer.com/dtnag/common/link.do?symbolicName=/ag/news/template1&amp;forceNavUpdate=false&amp;product=DTN/Ag/Business/Law&amp;vendorReference=cdc37f49-a12b-4710-8d92-f41326abfc58__1332164692532">Read the article.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elpc.org/2012/03/21/the-progressive-farmer-environmentalists-push-lawsuits-on-farm-nutrients/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ELPC, Mississippi River Coalition Sue EPA Over Nitrogen and Phosphorus Pollution</title>
		<link>http://elpc.org/2012/03/16/elpc-mississippi-river-coalition-sue-epa-over-nitrogen-and-phosphorus-pollution</link>
		<comments>http://elpc.org/2012/03/16/elpc-mississippi-river-coalition-sue-epa-over-nitrogen-and-phosphorus-pollution#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 19:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DJakubiak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ELPC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rivers and Lakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Suit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Center News Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi River Coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nitrogen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutrient pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phosphorus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elpc.org/?p=8544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mark Schleifstein of the New Orleans Times-Picayune covered the filing of two law suits against the EPA   by the Mississippi River Coalition. The Coalition, of which ELPC is a member, wants the EPA to set numeric standards for nitrogen and phosphorus levels in the Mississippi River and its tributaries, and wants to the agency to revisit wastewater [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark Schleifstein of the New Orleans Times-Picayune <a href="http://www.nola.com/environment/index.ssf/2012/03/environmental_groups_sue_epa_t.html">covered the filing of two law suits against the EPA  </a> by the Mississippi River Coalition. The Coalition, of which ELPC is a member, wants the EPA to set numeric standards for nitrogen and phosphorus levels in the Mississippi River and its tributaries, and wants to the agency to revisit wastewater treatment standards. Nitrogen and phosphorus are pollutants that contribute to the dead zone that emerges in the Gulf of Mexico each spring. <a href="http://www.nola.com/environment/index.ssf/2012/03/environmental_groups_sue_epa_t.html">Read the story.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elpc.org/2012/03/16/elpc-mississippi-river-coalition-sue-epa-over-nitrogen-and-phosphorus-pollution/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Congress, President Sign Legislation Allowing &#8220;Stillwater&#8221; Bridge in WI/MN</title>
		<link>http://elpc.org/2012/03/14/congress-president-sign-legislation-allowing-stillwater-bridge-in-wimn</link>
		<comments>http://elpc.org/2012/03/14/congress-president-sign-legislation-allowing-stillwater-bridge-in-wimn#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 16:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kcoleman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ELPC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rivers and Lakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St. Croix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stillwater]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elpc.org/?p=8758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Congress and the President signed a bill allowing construction of the Stillwater Bridge over the St. Croix River on the border of Minnesota and Wisconsin. ELPC and local allies are opposed to a massive new bridge, which we believe violates the Wild &#38; Scenic Rivers Act, will deface a pristine bluff, and will decimate recreational [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congress and the President signed a bill allowing construction of the Stillwater Bridge over the St. Croix River on the border of Minnesota and Wisconsin. ELPC and local allies are opposed to a massive new bridge, which we believe violates the Wild &amp; Scenic Rivers Act, will deface a pristine bluff, and will decimate recreational activities in the area. We are discussing potential next steps with our local allies. <a href="http://www.therepublic.com/view/story/90d32816d9334ae795733f70538d89e6/MN--St-Croix-Bridge/">Read the Associated Press story.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elpc.org/2012/03/14/congress-president-sign-legislation-allowing-stillwater-bridge-in-wimn/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Victory! Keeping Clean Water Clean in Indiana</title>
		<link>http://elpc.org/2012/03/14/victory-keeping-clean-water-clean-in-indiana</link>
		<comments>http://elpc.org/2012/03/14/victory-keeping-clean-water-clean-in-indiana#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kcoleman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ELPC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rivers and Lakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-Degradation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antidegradation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Water Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rivers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elpc.org/?p=8748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ELPC’s persistent advocacy with our Indiana colleagues resulted in a huge step toward keeping unnecessary pollution out of the clean lakes and rivers that wind through the Hoosier state. On March 15th, the Indiana Water Pollution Control Board (WPCB) voted 6-2 to adopt new “anti-degradation standards” under the Clean Water Act. This victory follows more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ELPC’s persistent advocacy with our Indiana colleagues resulted in a huge step toward keeping unnecessary pollution out of the clean lakes and rivers that wind through the Hoosier state. On March 15th, the Indiana Water Pollution Control Board (WPCB) voted 6-2 to adopt new “anti-degradation standards” under the Clean Water Act. This victory follows more than five years of work by ELPC and our allies across Indiana. Together, we drafted the standards and ushered them through the state’s decision-making process at the WPCB, where they were critiqued and revised through negotiations and testimony. The people of Indiana backed us up by writing to the Board members and telling them how important clean water is to them. ELPC will remain engaged in Indiana to ensure these new standards are implemented well. <a href="http://elpc.org/2012/03/14/water-pollution-control-board-votes-to-protect-indianas-waters">Read ELPC&#8217;s press statement about this victory</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elpc.org/2012/03/14/victory-keeping-clean-water-clean-in-indiana/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Administration Supports Continuing Investment in  Great Lakes Restoration</title>
		<link>http://elpc.org/2012/02/29/obama-administration-supports-continuing-investment-in-great-lakes-restoration</link>
		<comments>http://elpc.org/2012/02/29/obama-administration-supports-continuing-investment-in-great-lakes-restoration#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 21:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kcoleman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ELPC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Lakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Center Press Releases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elpc.org/2012/02/29/obama-administration-supports-continuing-investment-in-great-lakes-restoration</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President&#8217;s Goal Announced at White House Briefing with Great Lakes Leaders Washington, D.C. – President Obama’s proposal to expand the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative (GLRI) beyond its current FY14 time frame was announced today while an invited group of the region’s leaders were in town for a briefing with senior White House officials. Congress and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>President&#8217;s Goal Announced at White House Briefing with Great Lakes Leaders</strong></p>
<p><strong>Washington</strong><strong>, D.C.</strong><strong> </strong>– President Obama’s proposal to expand the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative (GLRI) beyond its current FY14 time frame was announced today while an invited group of the region’s leaders were in town for a briefing with senior White House officials.</p>
<p>Congress and the president have provided more than $1 billion for the GLRI since it first made history in 2009 as the largest commitment to Great Lakes restoration in a U.S. presidential budget. The sweeping initiative funds are designated to curb the influx of invasive species, clean beaches, remove toxic pollution and restore fish and wildlife habitat.</p>
<p>The announcement was made as some 80 of the Great Lakes region’s environmental, recreation, business and academic leaders met with senior White House officials today to discuss clean water, environmental and economic priorities in the region. Participants were invited to the briefing at the Executive Office Building, co-hosted by the White House Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) and the Office of Public Engagement, during Great Lakes Day events in Washington this week.</p>
<p>“Millions of people rely on the Great Lakes for fresh drinking water, recreation and economic vitality,” said Howard A. Learner, executive director of the Environmental Law &amp; Policy Center. “By expanding our investment in the Great Lakes, the Obama administration is protecting one of the nation’s &#8212; and the world’s &#8212; most valuable natural and economic assets.”</p>
<p>&#8220;A commitment to extending GLRI funding is critical to protecting our lakes, our national parks and our local economies,&#8221; said Lynn McClure, Midwest regional director for the National Parks Conservation Association. &#8220;In Michigan, one GLRI project alone has created 125 jobs and produced more than $66 million in economic benefits to the state.&#8221;</p>
<p>“This is an investment that will benefit the environment and the economy,” said Andy Buchsbaum, regional executive director for the National Wildlife Federation’s Great Lakes office. “Great Lakes programs are producing results &#8212; but there&#8217;s more to do. Today&#8217;s announcement signals that the Obama Administration is in this fight for the long haul.”</p>
<p>Economic recovery and environmental restoration were significant themes in the day’s discussion, which connected the goals of reducing nutrient pollution, cleaning up beaches and removing invasive species, to more tourism dollars for local communities and small businesses. Among the highlights:</p>
<p><strong>Asian Carp/Chicago Waterway:</strong> The groups praise the administration’s effort to build up agency budgets to support short-term Asian carp deterrents, and say they are pleased to learn that U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Assistant Secretary Jo-Ellen Darcy believes it is possible to shorten the timeline for the corps’ Great Lakes and Mississippi River Interbasin Study (GLMRIS). The congressional-ordered study – requiring the corps to determine options available to stop the transfer of invasive species between the two watersheds &#8212; is currently scheduled for completion in 2015. Looking forward, the groups seek a better understanding of how the administration will compress the study timeline and focus the effort on analyzing how to permanently separate the Great Lakes and Mississippi River.</p>
<p><strong>Ballast Water Discharge: </strong> The groups credit U.S. EPA for requiring treatment technology on board vessels for the first time, as well as for working to retain ballast water exchange for the Great  Lakes. But they note that EPA’s new draft permit has weaknesses &#8212; particularly in terms of technology availability determinations and the timeline for implementation &#8212; that could compromise this modest progress.</p>
<p><strong>Cleaner beaches:</strong> The groups say they are pleased to see a decrease in beach closings in Chicago and elsewhere. They urge the administration to continue supporting such progress in future years as beaches are a primary way people experience the Great Lakes, and serve as an economic engine for dozens of coastal communities.</p>
<p><strong>Nutrient pollution:</strong> The groups praise the yeoman’s effort by the U.S. Natural Resources Conservation Service and EPA to pool their resources and coordinate on the ground in the western Lake  Erie basin to address the already-critical algae-bloom threat. The groups say they anticipate the agencies using every tool in the box to drive down phosphorus loads to western Lake Erie and other critical areas around the lakes.</p>
<p><strong>Toxic cleanups:</strong> The groups applaud EPA’s tight focus and spending priority on cleaning up and delisting Areas of Concern, going way back to the early 2000s and passage of the Legacy Act. Such contamination holds Great  Lakes communities back from revitalization and cleanups should continue as a priority for the administration, the groups say.</p>
<p>Joel Brammeier, president and CEO of the Alliance for the Great Lakes, said that overall, “I was pleased and inspired to see and hear the highest levels of the Obama administration focused on restoring the Great Lakes in Washington this week. A healthy Great Lakes is a resource that everyone in the region can build on as we revitalize both our environment and economy. I look forward to continuing this collaborative work to restore the lakes and prevent threats from undermining our strong record of success.”</p>
<p>The briefing included opening remarks from U.S. Secretary of Commerce John Bryson about business development and jobs in the Great Lakes region, and a panel discussion with USDA Deputy Under Secretary Ann Mills, DOI Deputy Secretary David Hayes, and Cameron Davis, EPA senior advisor to the Administrator for Great Lakes.</p>
<p>“The administration made unprecedented investments in restoring the Great Lakes and made it a priority to work with state, city, environmental, academic and business leaders toward lasting solutions,” said Nancy Sutley, chairwoman of the White House CEQ. “Today’s gathering at the White House is another important step in advancing the partnership between federal agencies and community leaders that has fostered success for the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative and its goal of a healthy environment and a thriving economy for all Americans.”</p>
<p>The Great Lakes account for more than 20 percent of the world’s surface fresh water, with more than 30 million people living in the Great Lakes Basin.</p>
<p><strong>Contacts:</strong></p>
<p><strong>Alliance</strong><strong> for the Great  Lakes: </strong>Joel  Brammeier, President and CEO, 773-590-6494 (cell), <a href="mailto:jbrammeier@greatlakes.org">jbrammeier@greatlakes.org</a></p>
<p><strong>Environmental Law &amp; Policy Center: </strong>Howard Learner, Executive Director, 312-953-6841 (cell) <a href="mailto:HLearner@elpc.org">HLearner@elpc.org</a>; or Jill Geiger, Director of Communications and Marketing, 312-795-3703 (office)</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>National Parks Conservation Association: </strong>Lynn McClure, Midwest Regional Director, 312-343-7216 (cell), <a href="mailto:lmcclure@npca.org">lmcclure@npca.org</a></p>
<p><strong>National</strong><strong> Wildlife  Federation-Great Lakes</strong><strong> office:</strong> Andy Buchsbaum, Regional Executive Director, 734-717-3665 (cell), <a href="https://mail.greatlakes.org/OWA/redir.aspx?C=e2d8fdfa4df240a5ae191d94faa30b90&amp;URL=mailto%3abuchsbaum%40nwf.org" target="_blank">buchsbaum@nwf.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elpc.org/2012/02/29/obama-administration-supports-continuing-investment-in-great-lakes-restoration/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NYT: Power Station’s Closing Could Create Problems</title>
		<link>http://elpc.org/2012/02/13/nyt-power-station%e2%80%99s-closing-could-create-problems</link>
		<comments>http://elpc.org/2012/02/13/nyt-power-station%e2%80%99s-closing-could-create-problems#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kcoleman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chicago Clean Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal Plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ELPC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Lakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mercury Pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Line Coal Plant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elpc.org/2012/02/13/nyt-power-station%e2%80%99s-closing-could-create-problems</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this article from the Chicago section of the New York Times, Kari Lydersen reports on the imminent closing of the 83-year-old State Line Coal Plant. Its shutdown is being praised by environmentalists and others, but also raises new environmental and land use issues. Read the story.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this article from the Chicago section of the New York Times, Kari Lydersen reports on the imminent closing of the 83-year-old State Line Coal Plant. Its shutdown is being praised by environmentalists and others, but also raises new environmental and land use issues. <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/12/us/closing-of-state-line-power-station-on-illinois-indiana-border-is-expected-to-leave-problems-behind.html?_r=2&amp;scp=2&amp;sq=Lydersen&amp;st=cse">Read the story.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elpc.org/2012/02/13/nyt-power-station%e2%80%99s-closing-could-create-problems/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report Reveals How River Reversal Could Protect Great Lakes, Reduce Coal Access</title>
		<link>http://elpc.org/2012/02/08/report-reveals-how-river-reversal-could-protect-great-lakes-reduce-coal-access</link>
		<comments>http://elpc.org/2012/02/08/report-reveals-how-river-reversal-could-protect-great-lakes-reduce-coal-access#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kcoleman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ELPC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Lakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rivers and Lakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard Learner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Invasive Species]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Center News Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progress Illinois]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elpc.org/2012/02/08/report-reveals-how-river-reversal-could-protect-great-lakes-reduce-coal-access</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a Feb. 8 article from Progress Illinois, ELPC Executive Director Howard Learner discusses a new report that calls for reversing the flow of the Chicago River to curb the invasion of Asian Carp into the Great Lakes. Read the article.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://elpc.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/great_lakes_separation_alternatives.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-8346" style="margin-left: 10px; margin-right: 10px;" title="great_lakes_separation_alternatives" src="http://elpc.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/great_lakes_separation_alternatives.jpg" alt="" width="450" height="361" /></a>In a Feb. 8 article from Progress Illinois, ELPC Executive Director Howard Learner discusses a new report that calls for reversing the flow of the Chicago River  to curb the invasion of Asian Carp into the Great Lakes.</p>
<p><a href="http://progressillinois.com/posts/content/2012/02/08/report-reveals-how-river-reversal-could-protect-great-lakes-reduce-coal-acc">Read the article.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elpc.org/2012/02/08/report-reveals-how-river-reversal-could-protect-great-lakes-reduce-coal-access/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

