<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Environmental Law &#38; Policy Center &#187; Great Lakes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://elpc.org/category/natural-places/great-lakes-protection/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://elpc.org</link>
	<description>Protecting the Midwest&#039;s Environment and Natural Heritage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 21:23:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>E&amp;E News&#8217; ClimateWire Digs into Chicago Stormwater Issues</title>
		<link>http://elpc.org/2012/04/04/ee-news-climatewire-digs-into-chicago-stormwater-issues</link>
		<comments>http://elpc.org/2012/04/04/ee-news-climatewire-digs-into-chicago-stormwater-issues#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 14:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DJakubiak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ELPC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Lakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rivers and Lakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago Area Waterways System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ClimateWire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E&E News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jessica Dexter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lake Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Center News Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metropolitan Water Reclamation District]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sewage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stormwater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TARP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tunnel and Reservoir Plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waste water]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elpc.org/?p=8727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For an in-depth piece looking at the impact heavy rains have had on Chicago&#8217;s sewer system &#8212; and the resulting release of polluted wastewater into the Chicago River and Lake Michigan &#8212; Daniel Cusick spoke with the Environmental Law &#38; Policy Center&#8217;s Jessica Dexter. &#8220;Dexter and other critics say there&#8217;s no reason to spend another [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For an<a href="http://www.eenews.net/climatewire/2012/04/04/1"> in-depth piece looking at the impact heavy rains have had on Chicago&#8217;s sewer system</a> &#8212; and the resulting release of polluted wastewater into the Chicago River and Lake Michigan &#8212; <a href="https://twitter.com/#!/dcusickmpls">Daniel Cusick</a> spoke with the Environmental Law &amp; Policy Center&#8217;s <a href="http://elpc.org/dexter">Jessica Dexter</a>.</p>
<p><em>&#8220;Dexter and other critics say there&#8217;s no reason to spend another 17 years digging reservoirs when Chicago&#8217;s stormwater management challenges are growing more daunting by the year. If [the Tunnel and Reservoir Plan (TARP)] is to be the first line of defense against sewer overflows, the argument goes, it should be deployed much faster.</em></p>
<p><em>&#8216;We need to finish what we started in 1972, and do it as quickly as we can,&#8217; Dexter said.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>To read the full story, <a href="http://www.eenews.net/trial">sign up for an E&amp;Enews trial</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elpc.org/2012/04/04/ee-news-climatewire-digs-into-chicago-stormwater-issues/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Administration Supports Continuing Investment in  Great Lakes Restoration</title>
		<link>http://elpc.org/2012/02/29/obama-administration-supports-continuing-investment-in-great-lakes-restoration</link>
		<comments>http://elpc.org/2012/02/29/obama-administration-supports-continuing-investment-in-great-lakes-restoration#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 21:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kcoleman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ELPC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Lakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Center Press Releases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elpc.org/2012/02/29/obama-administration-supports-continuing-investment-in-great-lakes-restoration</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President&#8217;s Goal Announced at White House Briefing with Great Lakes Leaders Washington, D.C. – President Obama’s proposal to expand the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative (GLRI) beyond its current FY14 time frame was announced today while an invited group of the region’s leaders were in town for a briefing with senior White House officials. Congress and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>President&#8217;s Goal Announced at White House Briefing with Great Lakes Leaders</strong></p>
<p><strong>Washington</strong><strong>, D.C.</strong><strong> </strong>– President Obama’s proposal to expand the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative (GLRI) beyond its current FY14 time frame was announced today while an invited group of the region’s leaders were in town for a briefing with senior White House officials.</p>
<p>Congress and the president have provided more than $1 billion for the GLRI since it first made history in 2009 as the largest commitment to Great Lakes restoration in a U.S. presidential budget. The sweeping initiative funds are designated to curb the influx of invasive species, clean beaches, remove toxic pollution and restore fish and wildlife habitat.</p>
<p>The announcement was made as some 80 of the Great Lakes region’s environmental, recreation, business and academic leaders met with senior White House officials today to discuss clean water, environmental and economic priorities in the region. Participants were invited to the briefing at the Executive Office Building, co-hosted by the White House Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) and the Office of Public Engagement, during Great Lakes Day events in Washington this week.</p>
<p>“Millions of people rely on the Great Lakes for fresh drinking water, recreation and economic vitality,” said Howard A. Learner, executive director of the Environmental Law &amp; Policy Center. “By expanding our investment in the Great Lakes, the Obama administration is protecting one of the nation’s &#8212; and the world’s &#8212; most valuable natural and economic assets.”</p>
<p>&#8220;A commitment to extending GLRI funding is critical to protecting our lakes, our national parks and our local economies,&#8221; said Lynn McClure, Midwest regional director for the National Parks Conservation Association. &#8220;In Michigan, one GLRI project alone has created 125 jobs and produced more than $66 million in economic benefits to the state.&#8221;</p>
<p>“This is an investment that will benefit the environment and the economy,” said Andy Buchsbaum, regional executive director for the National Wildlife Federation’s Great Lakes office. “Great Lakes programs are producing results &#8212; but there&#8217;s more to do. Today&#8217;s announcement signals that the Obama Administration is in this fight for the long haul.”</p>
<p>Economic recovery and environmental restoration were significant themes in the day’s discussion, which connected the goals of reducing nutrient pollution, cleaning up beaches and removing invasive species, to more tourism dollars for local communities and small businesses. Among the highlights:</p>
<p><strong>Asian Carp/Chicago Waterway:</strong> The groups praise the administration’s effort to build up agency budgets to support short-term Asian carp deterrents, and say they are pleased to learn that U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Assistant Secretary Jo-Ellen Darcy believes it is possible to shorten the timeline for the corps’ Great Lakes and Mississippi River Interbasin Study (GLMRIS). The congressional-ordered study – requiring the corps to determine options available to stop the transfer of invasive species between the two watersheds &#8212; is currently scheduled for completion in 2015. Looking forward, the groups seek a better understanding of how the administration will compress the study timeline and focus the effort on analyzing how to permanently separate the Great Lakes and Mississippi River.</p>
<p><strong>Ballast Water Discharge: </strong> The groups credit U.S. EPA for requiring treatment technology on board vessels for the first time, as well as for working to retain ballast water exchange for the Great  Lakes. But they note that EPA’s new draft permit has weaknesses &#8212; particularly in terms of technology availability determinations and the timeline for implementation &#8212; that could compromise this modest progress.</p>
<p><strong>Cleaner beaches:</strong> The groups say they are pleased to see a decrease in beach closings in Chicago and elsewhere. They urge the administration to continue supporting such progress in future years as beaches are a primary way people experience the Great Lakes, and serve as an economic engine for dozens of coastal communities.</p>
<p><strong>Nutrient pollution:</strong> The groups praise the yeoman’s effort by the U.S. Natural Resources Conservation Service and EPA to pool their resources and coordinate on the ground in the western Lake  Erie basin to address the already-critical algae-bloom threat. The groups say they anticipate the agencies using every tool in the box to drive down phosphorus loads to western Lake Erie and other critical areas around the lakes.</p>
<p><strong>Toxic cleanups:</strong> The groups applaud EPA’s tight focus and spending priority on cleaning up and delisting Areas of Concern, going way back to the early 2000s and passage of the Legacy Act. Such contamination holds Great  Lakes communities back from revitalization and cleanups should continue as a priority for the administration, the groups say.</p>
<p>Joel Brammeier, president and CEO of the Alliance for the Great Lakes, said that overall, “I was pleased and inspired to see and hear the highest levels of the Obama administration focused on restoring the Great Lakes in Washington this week. A healthy Great Lakes is a resource that everyone in the region can build on as we revitalize both our environment and economy. I look forward to continuing this collaborative work to restore the lakes and prevent threats from undermining our strong record of success.”</p>
<p>The briefing included opening remarks from U.S. Secretary of Commerce John Bryson about business development and jobs in the Great Lakes region, and a panel discussion with USDA Deputy Under Secretary Ann Mills, DOI Deputy Secretary David Hayes, and Cameron Davis, EPA senior advisor to the Administrator for Great Lakes.</p>
<p>“The administration made unprecedented investments in restoring the Great Lakes and made it a priority to work with state, city, environmental, academic and business leaders toward lasting solutions,” said Nancy Sutley, chairwoman of the White House CEQ. “Today’s gathering at the White House is another important step in advancing the partnership between federal agencies and community leaders that has fostered success for the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative and its goal of a healthy environment and a thriving economy for all Americans.”</p>
<p>The Great Lakes account for more than 20 percent of the world’s surface fresh water, with more than 30 million people living in the Great Lakes Basin.</p>
<p><strong>Contacts:</strong></p>
<p><strong>Alliance</strong><strong> for the Great  Lakes: </strong>Joel  Brammeier, President and CEO, 773-590-6494 (cell), <a href="mailto:jbrammeier@greatlakes.org">jbrammeier@greatlakes.org</a></p>
<p><strong>Environmental Law &amp; Policy Center: </strong>Howard Learner, Executive Director, 312-953-6841 (cell) <a href="mailto:HLearner@elpc.org">HLearner@elpc.org</a>; or Jill Geiger, Director of Communications and Marketing, 312-795-3703 (office)</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>National Parks Conservation Association: </strong>Lynn McClure, Midwest Regional Director, 312-343-7216 (cell), <a href="mailto:lmcclure@npca.org">lmcclure@npca.org</a></p>
<p><strong>National</strong><strong> Wildlife  Federation-Great Lakes</strong><strong> office:</strong> Andy Buchsbaum, Regional Executive Director, 734-717-3665 (cell), <a href="https://mail.greatlakes.org/OWA/redir.aspx?C=e2d8fdfa4df240a5ae191d94faa30b90&amp;URL=mailto%3abuchsbaum%40nwf.org" target="_blank">buchsbaum@nwf.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elpc.org/2012/02/29/obama-administration-supports-continuing-investment-in-great-lakes-restoration/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NYT: Power Station’s Closing Could Create Problems</title>
		<link>http://elpc.org/2012/02/13/nyt-power-station%e2%80%99s-closing-could-create-problems</link>
		<comments>http://elpc.org/2012/02/13/nyt-power-station%e2%80%99s-closing-could-create-problems#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kcoleman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chicago Clean Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal Plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ELPC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Lakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mercury Pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Line Coal Plant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elpc.org/2012/02/13/nyt-power-station%e2%80%99s-closing-could-create-problems</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this article from the Chicago section of the New York Times, Kari Lydersen reports on the imminent closing of the 83-year-old State Line Coal Plant. Its shutdown is being praised by environmentalists and others, but also raises new environmental and land use issues. Read the story.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this article from the Chicago section of the New York Times, Kari Lydersen reports on the imminent closing of the 83-year-old State Line Coal Plant. Its shutdown is being praised by environmentalists and others, but also raises new environmental and land use issues. <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/12/us/closing-of-state-line-power-station-on-illinois-indiana-border-is-expected-to-leave-problems-behind.html?_r=2&amp;scp=2&amp;sq=Lydersen&amp;st=cse">Read the story.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elpc.org/2012/02/13/nyt-power-station%e2%80%99s-closing-could-create-problems/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report Reveals How River Reversal Could Protect Great Lakes, Reduce Coal Access</title>
		<link>http://elpc.org/2012/02/08/report-reveals-how-river-reversal-could-protect-great-lakes-reduce-coal-access</link>
		<comments>http://elpc.org/2012/02/08/report-reveals-how-river-reversal-could-protect-great-lakes-reduce-coal-access#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kcoleman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ELPC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Lakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rivers and Lakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard Learner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Invasive Species]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Center News Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progress Illinois]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elpc.org/2012/02/08/report-reveals-how-river-reversal-could-protect-great-lakes-reduce-coal-access</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a Feb. 8 article from Progress Illinois, ELPC Executive Director Howard Learner discusses a new report that calls for reversing the flow of the Chicago River to curb the invasion of Asian Carp into the Great Lakes. Read the article.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://elpc.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/great_lakes_separation_alternatives.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-8346" style="margin-left: 10px; margin-right: 10px;" title="great_lakes_separation_alternatives" src="http://elpc.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/great_lakes_separation_alternatives.jpg" alt="" width="450" height="361" /></a>In a Feb. 8 article from Progress Illinois, ELPC Executive Director Howard Learner discusses a new report that calls for reversing the flow of the Chicago River  to curb the invasion of Asian Carp into the Great Lakes.</p>
<p><a href="http://progressillinois.com/posts/content/2012/02/08/report-reveals-how-river-reversal-could-protect-great-lakes-reduce-coal-acc">Read the article.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elpc.org/2012/02/08/report-reveals-how-river-reversal-could-protect-great-lakes-reduce-coal-access/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Statement from Howard Learner: Separating the Chicago Area Waterway System is an Important Step to Protect the Great Lakes’ Ecology and Economy</title>
		<link>http://elpc.org/2012/01/31/statement-from-howard-learner-separating-the-chicago-area-waterway-system-is-an-important-step-to-protect-the-great-lakes%e2%80%99-ecology-and-economy</link>
		<comments>http://elpc.org/2012/01/31/statement-from-howard-learner-separating-the-chicago-area-waterway-system-is-an-important-step-to-protect-the-great-lakes%e2%80%99-ecology-and-economy#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kcoleman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ELPC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Lakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Notes from ELPC's President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rivers and Lakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asian Carp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago Area Waterways Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard Learner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Center Press Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St. Lawrence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elpc.org/2012/01/31/statement-from-howard-learner-separating-the-chicago-area-waterway-system-is-an-important-step-to-protect-the-great-lakes%e2%80%99-ecology-and-economy</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, the Great Lakes Commission and the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence Cities Initiative released its Chicago Area Waterways Study (CAWS), which offers recommended action steps to protect the Great Lakes from Asian carp and other invasive species. ELPC Executive Director Howard Learner released this statement about the study and its recommendations. “Separating the Great [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, the Great Lakes Commission and the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence Cities Initiative released its Chicago Area Waterways Study (CAWS), which offers recommended action steps to protect the Great Lakes from Asian carp and other invasive species. ELPC Executive Director Howard Learner released this statement about the study and its recommendations.</p>
<p>“Separating the Great Lakes from the Mississippi River Basin is a key step to protect both the ecological and economic value of the Great Lakes. More than 30 million people live in the Great Lakes Basin and rely on its abundance of freshwater, which is under increasing threat from Asian carp and other invasive species. The release of this important study and action framework today advances important Great Lakes values.</p>
<p>“The Study shows that strong and effective action is needed sooner than later to protect Lake Michigan and the other Great Lakes. We have to get this right from the start. There are no do-over ‘Mulligans’ if invasive species get into our Great Lakes.”</p>
<p>Mr. Learner served as a member of the Advisory Committee for the Chicago Area Waterways Study project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elpc.org/2012/01/31/statement-from-howard-learner-separating-the-chicago-area-waterway-system-is-an-important-step-to-protect-the-great-lakes%e2%80%99-ecology-and-economy/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Report Demonstrates that Permanent Physical Barriers to Stop Asian Carp at Chicago are Feasible</title>
		<link>http://elpc.org/2012/01/31/new-report-demonstrates-that-permanent-physical-barriers-to-stop-asian-carp-at-chicago-are-feasible</link>
		<comments>http://elpc.org/2012/01/31/new-report-demonstrates-that-permanent-physical-barriers-to-stop-asian-carp-at-chicago-are-feasible#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kcoleman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ELPC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Lakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rivers and Lakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asain Carp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago Area Waterways System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Lakes Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Invasive Species]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St. Lawrence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elpc.org/2012/01/31/new-report-demonstrates-that-permanent-physical-barriers-to-stop-asian-carp-at-chicago-are-feasible</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Strategies for restoring the natural divide between the Great Lakes and Mississippi River basins to keep Asian carp out of the Great Lakes – and, in the process, modernizing the Chicago Area Waterway System (CAWS) – are identified in a report released today by the Great Lakes Commission and the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strategies for restoring the natural divide between the Great Lakes and Mississippi River basins to keep Asian carp out of the Great Lakes – and, in the process, modernizing the Chicago Area Waterway System (CAWS) – are identified in a report released today by the Great Lakes Commission and the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence Cities Initiative.</p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p>“Physically separating the Great Lakes and Mississippi River watersheds is the best long-term solution for preventing the movement of Asian carp and other aquatic invasive species, and our report demonstrates that it can be done,” said Tim Eder, executive director of the Great Lakes Commission.</p>
<p>The threat of Asian carp looms large for communities in the Great Lakes region. The lakes provide over 35 million residents with drinking water, contain 20 percent of the Earth’s fresh surface water, and support a thriving tourism industry and world-class fishery, which generates an estimated $7 billion in economic activity annually.</p>
<p>Voracious feeders that can grow up to 90 pounds, Asian carp have overrun other ecosystems and could cause irreversible damage to the Great Lakes if allowed entry. Once established, invasive species are nearly impossible to eliminate.</p>
<p>“This is a unique opportunity for both protection of the Great Lakes and Mississippi River and for a Chicago waterway system for the 21st century and beyond,” said David Ullrich, executive director of the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence Cities Initiative. “No single use of the CAWS, including transportation, flood control and wastewater treatment, can be considered individually. The system requires an integrated approach and that is what we have taken.”</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p>The three separation alternatives include a down-river single barrier between the confluence of the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal and the Cal-Sag Channel and the Lockport Lock; a mid-system alternative of four barriers on CAWS branches between Lockport and Lake Michigan; and a near-lake alternative of up to five barriers closest to the lakeshore. All three include measures to improve the CAWS’s role in flood management, wastewater treatment and maritime transportation, as well as stopping the interbasin movement of aquatic invasive species.</p>
<p>The three separation alternatives in the report were developed by the engineering firm HDR, Inc., which considered some 20 possible barrier locations in its analysis. No recommended alternative is identified. However, one alternative, the mid-system solution, is the least costly and offers other advantages.</p>
<p>The analysis concludes that preventing just a single invasive species from entering the Great Lakes can save as much as $5 billion over 30 years. The Corps of Engineers has identified 10 species that are poised to invade the Great Lakes from the Mississippi River.</p>
<p>According to the report’s economic analysis, the cost of the barriers themselves is as low as $109 million. The addition of all improvements to address water quality, flood prevention and transportation brings the cost to between $3.2 billion and $9.5 billion, depending on the location and the degree to which the wastewater treatment plants on the system are improved to meet future Clean Water Act requirements.</p>
<p>The analysis also finds that households in the Great Lakes basin would have to be willing to pay, on average, about $1 a month from now through 2059 to cover the cost of the mid-system alternative, based on a projected cost of $4.27 billion. The Great Lakes Commission and the Cities Initiative point out that the construction costs to build the current CAWS in today’s dollars would be $11 billion.</p>
<p>Asian carp have been migrating up the Mississippi River system since the early 1990s and were detected in 2009 to have breached electronic barriers operated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in the CAWS. In 2010 a live Asian carp was captured in Lake Calumet just six miles from Lake Michigan.</p>
<p>“The current efforts by the state of Illinois, the Corps of Engineers and others to monitor and slow the carp migration are critical and are buying us time to implement a long-term solution,” said Eder.</p>
<p>“While we recognize and support the work being done by others to find solutions to the Asian carp threat, we need to appreciate fully the urgency of this matter,” Ullrich emphasized.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p>The Great Lakes Commission, representing the eight Great Lakes states plus the Canadian provinces of Ontario and Québec, and the Cities Initiative, a coalition of U.S. and Canadian mayors, embarked on the accelerated study in 2010 believing separation to be the best strategy for preventing the movement of Asian carp and other aquatic invasive species between the two watersheds via the CAWS. The $2 million project was funded by a collaboration of six regional funders: the Joyce Foundation, C.S. Mott Foundation, Great Lakes Fishery Trust, Wege Foundation, Great Lakes Protection Fund and Frey Foundation.</p>
<p>To provide guidance and input for the project, a bipartisan Executive Committee was established and a diverse Advisory Committee was convened among stakeholders from the Great Lakes region, with an emphasis on interest groups in the Chicago area. In addition, a Resource Group made up of governmental and quasi-governmental entities with a direct interest in the project also participated.</p>
<p>The report and all supporting materials are available at <a href="http://www.glc.org/caws/">www.glc.org/caws</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://elpc.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/FINAL_CAWS_news_release_1-30-20121.pdf">Download this news release.</a></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elpc.org/2012/01/31/new-report-demonstrates-that-permanent-physical-barriers-to-stop-asian-carp-at-chicago-are-feasible/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chicago Tribune Editorial by Howard Learner: Mercury Pollution Reduction Standards Protect Children&#8217;s Health and the Great Lakes</title>
		<link>http://elpc.org/2011/12/29/chicago-tribune-editoral-by-howard-learner-mercury-pollution-reduction-standards-protect-childrens-health-and-the-great-lakes</link>
		<comments>http://elpc.org/2011/12/29/chicago-tribune-editoral-by-howard-learner-mercury-pollution-reduction-standards-protect-childrens-health-and-the-great-lakes#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 15:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kcoleman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Coal Plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ELPC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Lakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mercury Pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago Tribune]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Center Op-Ed Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Repowering the Midwest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elpc.org/2011/12/29/chicago-tribune-editoral-by-howard-learner-mercury-pollution-reduction-standards-protect-childrens-health-and-the-great-lakes</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the Chicago Tribune&#8216;s lead editorial on Dec. 28th, ELPC Executive Director Howard Learner discusses why the EPA&#8217;s recently announced federal Mercury and Air Toxics Standard is good for public health, the environment and the economy. Illinois enacted strong state standards in 2006 and has proven that it&#8217;s possible to control pollution from coal plants. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the <em>Chicago Tribune</em>&#8216;s lead editorial on Dec. 28th, ELPC Executive Director Howard Learner discusses why the EPA&#8217;s recently announced federal Mercury and Air Toxics Standard is good for public health, the environment and the economy. Illinois enacted strong state standards in 2006 and has proven that it&#8217;s possible to control pollution from coal plants. The new federal rules will level the playing field among coal plants in all states. <a href="http://trib.in/uxF3tI">Read the editorial.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elpc.org/2011/12/29/chicago-tribune-editoral-by-howard-learner-mercury-pollution-reduction-standards-protect-childrens-health-and-the-great-lakes/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Federal Mercury and Air Toxics Standards Will Protect Children’s Health and the Environment</title>
		<link>http://elpc.org/2011/12/21/new-federal-mercury-and-air-toxics-standards-will-protect-children%e2%80%99s-health-and-the-environment-2</link>
		<comments>http://elpc.org/2011/12/21/new-federal-mercury-and-air-toxics-standards-will-protect-children%e2%80%99s-health-and-the-environment-2#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 20:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kcoleman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Coal Plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ELPC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Lakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Center Press Releases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elpc.org/2011/12/21/new-federal-mercury-and-air-toxics-standards-will-protect-children%e2%80%99s-health-and-the-environment-2</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) finalized the first-ever federal standards to reduce mercury, arsenic, chromium and other toxic air pollutants from power plants. EPA estimates that these standards will prevent thousands of hospitalizations and emergency room visits and 17,000 premature deaths each year. Implementing the standards, which were called for in the 1990 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) finalized the first-ever federal <a href="http://www.epa.gov/airquality/powerplanttoxics/actions.html">standards</a> to reduce mercury, arsenic, chromium and other toxic air pollutants from power plants. EPA estimates that these standards will prevent thousands of hospitalizations and emergency room visits and 17,000 premature deaths each year. Implementing the standards, which were called for in the 1990 Clean Air Act amendments and are now long overdue, creates a level playing field for the energy industry after more than 20 years of uncertainty and delays</p>
<p>“These standards mean power plants will invest in modern pollution controls, and that investment will create jobs, cleaner air and better public health,” said Howard Learner, Executive Director of the Environmental Law &amp; Policy Center. “Illinois adopted mercury pollution reduction standards in 2006 and modern control equipment has been installed at almost all coal plants in the state.  The technology works, the lights have stayed on, mercury pollution has been reduced and children’s health is better protected.  It’s time for the holdout utilities to stop crying wolf, stop stalling and clean up their pollution to protect children’s health and our rivers and lakes.”</p>
<p>“Illinois and other states have led the way and shown that these federal standards are reasonable and attainable,” said Learner. “With federal standards in place, all Americans will gain the benefits of better health and cleaner and safer water.”</p>
<p>Mercury is a potent neurotoxin that can harm fetal brain development, reducing children’s IQ and their ability to learn.  According to EPA estimates, about 300,000 babies are born in the U.S. every year at risk of neurological damage because of mercury.</p>
<p>The Mercury and Air Toxics Standards set a 3-5 year timeline for power plant owners to install widely available modern technology to reduce mercury pollution by 91% and drastically reduce arsenic, chromium, acid gases and other toxic air pollutants which are known or suspected of causing cancer and other serious health effects. The new standards will create thousands of jobs around the country as power plant owners hire people to build, install and operate modern pollution control equipment needed to reduce mercury and other toxics from their plants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elpc.org/2011/12/21/new-federal-mercury-and-air-toxics-standards-will-protect-children%e2%80%99s-health-and-the-environment-2/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. EPA Announces Final Mercury &amp; Air Toxics Standards for Power Plants</title>
		<link>http://elpc.org/2011/12/21/u-s-epa-announces-final-mercury-air-toxics-standards-for-power-plants</link>
		<comments>http://elpc.org/2011/12/21/u-s-epa-announces-final-mercury-air-toxics-standards-for-power-plants#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 19:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kcoleman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Coal Plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ELPC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Lakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mercury Pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elpc.org/2011/12/21/u-s-epa-announces-final-mercury-air-toxics-standards-for-power-plants</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) today announced a new Mercury and Air Toxics Standard that will greatly reduce the amount of mercury, acid gases and other toxic pollution emitted from coal plants. This landmark move by EPA will reinforce the important Clean Air Act public health standards enacted more than 20 years ago. Read [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) today announced a new Mercury and Air Toxics Standard that will greatly reduce the amount of mercury, acid gases and other toxic pollution emitted from coal plants. This landmark move by EPA will reinforce the important Clean Air Act public health standards enacted more than 20 years ago. <a href="http://www.epa.gov/airquality/powerplanttoxics/actions.html">Read the EPA&#8217;s announcement and final rule.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elpc.org/2011/12/21/u-s-epa-announces-final-mercury-air-toxics-standards-for-power-plants/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ELPC Science Advisor Dr. Knute Nadelhoffer Testifies Before House Panel on Climate Science</title>
		<link>http://elpc.org/2011/03/08/house-testimony-of-dr-nadelhoffer</link>
		<comments>http://elpc.org/2011/03/08/house-testimony-of-dr-nadelhoffer#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 15:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>HLearner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ELPC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Lakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elpc.org/?p=5454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Tuesday, March 8, 2011, Dr. Nadelhoffer testified before the U.S. House Energy &#38; Commerce Committee hearing entitled “Climate Science and EPA&#8217;s Greenhouse Gas Regulations.” As a scientific advisor to the ELPC, Dr. Nadelhoffer addressed the ecological impacts of climate change specifically within the Great Lakes basin. Read Dr. Nadelhoffer&#8217;s testimony here.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Tuesday, March 8, 2011, Dr. Nadelhoffer testified before the U.S. House Energy &amp; Commerce Committee hearing entitled “Climate Science and EPA&#8217;s Greenhouse Gas Regulations.” As a scientific advisor to the ELPC, Dr. Nadelhoffer addressed the ecological impacts of climate change specifically within the Great Lakes basin.</p>
<div id="_mcePaste"><a href="http://republicans.energycommerce.house.gov/Media/file/Hearings/Energy/030811/Nadelhoffer.pdf" target="_blank">Read Dr. Nadelhoffer&#8217;s testimony here.</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elpc.org/2011/03/08/house-testimony-of-dr-nadelhoffer/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

